• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Gamification Nation logo

Gamification Nation

Gamification and game design for business results

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Solutions
    • Gamification strategy and design
    • Serious games design & development
    • Tools
    • FREE RESOURCES for COVID-19 – Serious Fun
      • A Planet called Hope
      • Covid-19: Guess what – Poll
  • Speaking
  • Store
  • About us
    • About Gamification Nation
    • Awards
    • What our followers and clients say…
    • In the media
    • Contact Us
(+44) 0845 056 9828
Is gamification right for your project?

A question of morals?

An Coppens | 24th September, 2019

share:

Is nudging someone into optimal choices for their health, learning, productivity and life, something we should encourage? It is a moral question that popped up as I was reading the book “Nudge” by Nobel prize winner and esteemed economist Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein. He writes about experiments carried out at high schools in the USA, where depending on the layout and design of the cafeteria, the choices of students could be influenced. He then named it libertarian parentalism, basically leaving the freedom of choice, whilst also leaving a visible trail of optimal choices.

In a way, to me, it seems like this is reverse engineering what advertising and product placement companies have been doing for years. Typically in their case for a company to make a profit on it instead of focusing on the individual’s well-being in the equation. Gamification for behaviour change, threads this same fine line of manipulation versus encouragement.

In my opinion, gamification should always be based on voluntary participation and allowing for personal choice. It should also allow you to learn from your choices with feedback loops. Life will give you feedback in any case, but some of this may come so much after the facts, that you may no longer remember what was the original cause for it. Instant feedback thanks to a gamified solution, may enable you to make a new choice or stick with a choice if it is a helpful one.

Because we work in the HR and learning space, I am always mindful of the impact we can have both positively and negatively. When we design to increase productivity, the individual still needs to have the choice to set boundaries, when to switch off and when to continue. Personalisation based on preferences from individuals, I believe is essential for the long-term success and buy-in of our work and this includes a preference reset if the individual wants to do this.

From the book, we learn that most people will not even exercise the right to choose, which begs the next question. When a choice is required, but not made then should the default setting be optimised or just set to 0? It is an experiment the authors researched in the case of renewing benefits on annual basis at a university for its staff. Reminders worked for some, but not for everyone and some people simply didn’t have the time. The majority preferred their choices from previous years to remain instead of a full reset to 0. In this case, optimising was preferred.

Gamification by default raises some of these questions. The very introduction of certain game mechanics introduces a work dynamic which may be collaborative, competitive or other. How we as gamification designers work with these choices requires a sense of morality and in my view often also life experience or an insight into human emotional impact. I am always open with my clients when we start talking about the gameplay options about the kind of effects and impact they may create. Sometimes the enthusiasm to design a game experience distracts the clients from being mindful about what they are starting. So we need to bring that into play and discuss it from the outset. I would rather see gamification for good, than anything else.

What do you see as the moral questions in relation to gamification?

Categories: business gamification Tags: ethics, Gamification, gamification design, morals

share:

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Book a Strategy Consultation

Strategy consultation

Book a strategy session now and find out what is possible for your company.

BOOK NOW

Buy your game deck

Buy your game deck

Build your own gamified experiences with our game deck

Buy Game Deck

Must Buy Book: Tapping into the Crowd by An Coppens

Must Buy Book: Tapping into the Crowd by An Coppens

Buy Book

Featured Post

What is the impact for corporate sector initiatives when the games market valuation numbers soar to record heights?

UKIE, the UK interactive entertainment association published figures today to show that the consumer game market valuation has grown to over £7 … Read More about What is the impact for corporate sector initiatives when the games market valuation numbers soar to record heights?

Related Posts

Adult learning image for article on https://www.gamificationnation.com/blog

Can enforced gamification inhibit your learner’s motivation?

Gamification is still very often misunderstood and simply branded as the...

Summer of silence

Summer of Silence It has been a while since I posted a written blog or a...

Reflections on a decade in gamification www.gamificationnation.com/blog

A decade of gamification

In reflecting on a decade of gamification, at least that is how long I...

Footer

Our UK Office

Gamification Nation Ltd,
Kemp House,
152 City Road,
London, EC1V 2NX,
UK
Companies House Registration: 08145023
VAT number:
GB304326932
Tel: (+44) 0845 056 9828
Email: [email protected]

Our EU office

Gamification Nation Europe AB,
Ronnebyvagen 22
12152 Johanneshov
Stockholm
Sweden
Organisations number: 559300-2339
VAT number:

Are you ready to start your project?

GET IN TOUCH
© Copyright 2013 – 2021 Gamification Nation. All rights reserved.
  • Anti-spam Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Linking policy
  • Terms
This site uses cookies: Find out more.